Guys, it’s time to pack it up and go home. We just got owned.
This may seem late, but it isn’t. Recently, Bill Nye debated Ken Ham. A number of people opposed Nye’s decision to participate. Among the reasons, one of them was the stand out: it makes it seem as if creationism is on equal footing with evolution. This is a misconception that needs to be…
True bible believers are few and far between…while religious hypocrites abound…who pontificate that the bible are their god’s words…and then don’t even bother to read them…let alone follow them…!
1. The top graphic shows that true bible fundamentalists…Americans who read the bible at least 4 times a week…have fallen to a measly 19% of the population…and are matched precisely, by skeptics who hold the most negative or non-sacred view of the bible…
2. The lower graphic reveals the amazing reality…that whereas 56% of Americans disingenuously and hypocritically give lip-service to the claim that the bible contains the actual words of their god…a pathetic 37% of Americans bother to read these “divine” words, even once a week…let alone follow them…!
Whereas conflicting beliefs (an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially without proof) and even worse…faith (strong belief in the doctrines and dogma of a religion, based on blind allegiance rather than proof) leads to worldwide chaos…exchanging sectarian alliance for secular morality/humanism…leads to the establishment of mutually applying equal rights…and thereby, peaceful coexistence…
In December 1981 I appeared as an expert witness for the plaintiffs and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in their successful challenge of Arkansas Act 590, which demanded that teachers give “balanced treatment” to “creation-science” and evolutionary ideas. My presence occasioned some surprise, for I am an historian and philosopher of science In this essay, I do not intend to apologize for either my existence or my calling, nor do I intend to relive past victories ; rather, I want to explain why a philosopher and historian of science finds the teaching of “creation-science” in science classrooms offensive.
Obviously, the crux of the issue—the center of the plaintiffs’ case—is the status of creation-science. Its advocates claim that it is genuine science and may, therefore, be legitimately and properly taught in the public schools. Its detractors claim that it is not genuine science but a form of religion—dogmatic Biblical literalism by another name. Which is it, and who is to decide?
"Vaccination has greatly reduced the burden of infectious diseases. Only clean water, also considered to be a basic human right, performs better.1 Paradoxically, a vociferous antivaccine lobby thrives today in spite of the undeniable success of vaccination programmes against formerly fearsome diseases that are now rare in developed countries…Diseases can be eliminated locally without global eradication of the causative microorganism.”
Rates of the cancer-causing virus have been reduced by half thanks to a vigorous vaccination campaign… http://discovermagazine.com/2014/jan-feb/35-hpv-vaccine-reduces-rate-of-cancer-causing-virus
via David G. McAfee